News
Monthly Archive for November 2006
Our take on “converts” or seed bridges
November 17, 2006
Cross-posted from private equity HUB.
There has been plenty of discussion recently among entrepreneurs regarding bridge loans for startups, also know as “converts”. Josh Kopelman wrote a nice post here, and Matt Marshall posted a bridge loan calculator for entrepreneurs here. Lots of people ask us our view on these structures, because we’re focused only on Seed and Series A deals. Despite the convenience of converts, we at True don’t do them (though we did participate in a bridge-convert at Meebo, as angels prior to closing the True fund). We don’t like them because they have the potential to create multiple conflicts of interest between the investor and entrepreneur. Worse, these conflicts are inserted into this crucial relationship on day one.
As entrepreneurs ourselves, we started True with the core belief that the venture industry should be better aligned with entrepreneurs. We literally named the firm True in reference to aligning a bike wheel. Clear alignment of incentives between our firm and founders is critical to everything we do. I’ll discuss some of the potential for conflict below, with the caveat that for non-professional investors, there can be some advantages to the convert. If you’re an angel from another industry, I admit that it could be risky for you to price a deal in a market in which you don’t have knowledge or experience. For experienced entrepreneurs and investors, in our view the conflicts clearly outweigh the convenience.
Nothing ventured . . . .
November 16, 2006
This post is derived from an article that I was asked to write for my high school alumni magazine (print, not online). The article discusses part of the founding of True, so we thought it might be of interest more broadly to entrepreneurs.
—————–
The Northern California afternoon was hot and sunny. I walked to the railing and saw Silicon Valley stretched out before me. As I considered the power of entrepreneurship and innovation in the valley below, the weight of my decision hit me. Just a few minutes earlier I notified my employer that I was leaving to start my own firm. There was no turning back. It was June 2005, and one of my career’s most significant transitions had just begun.
Though I envisioned this moment many times, I was shocked by the strength of my conflicting emotions. I was exhilarated, uncertain and yes, afraid. The challenge I was about to undertake would risk my savings, entail a year of non-stop travel and require a rigorous audit on the entirety of my professional life. The odds were against me. Starting a new Venture Capital firm is hard to do, and most new efforts fail. Investors think new firms are at a disadvantage, so they are reluctant to invest in all but the biggest firms. The big get bigger, and the perception is that bigger is better. I believed small firms had many advantages.
Blogs for the Rest of Us
November 9, 2006
Tony Conrad does his part to make the blogosphere “a little less geek oriented.”
Sphere: Bloggers Go Mainstream, US News & World Report, November 9, 2006
Lately:
RSS FeedArchives:
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006